I have been thinking about marriage a lot recently. No, I don’t have a fairy tale fantasy, as in: “oh, when will my prince charming finally come take me away to New York, Massachusetts, Iowa, Vermont, Connecticut, or New Hampshire to seal the deal?” Nor am I wistfully daydreaming of that perfect day: “there will be pretty white flowers on every table, and little folded cards with each person’s name typed in curlicues, and I’ll be wearing Vera Wang and I won’t have any blemishes and my hair will be fabulous…”
No. I have been thinking of weddings because a) I was the best man at my older brother’s wedding three weeks ago, b) gay marriage was just legalized in New York, c) I just attended a beautiful “deepening ceremony” held by two committed lovers in Portland, and d) I have been living in rural Tennessee with the “faeries,” a radical queer community that features many alternative expressions of love, sexuality, and gender. The intersection of these events has been fascinating, inspiring, amusing, and difficult at times. I am eager and excited to share some of what I have learned.
—————————–
Politics…
Before I talk about these personal experiences, let me be perfectly clear on my political stance: marriage is an oppressive institution because it rewards straight monogamous life partners, and only straight monogamous life partners, with a long list of health-related, economic, and social privileges. Should all people not be entitled to these benefits, regardless of what their love life looks like? Marriage directly builds inequality for anyone who doesn’t fit into a certain relationship model – and though the struggle for “gay marriage equality” does include gay, cisgender, monogamous life partners, it excludes everything outside of those boundaries. What about asexuals, polyamorous lovers, gender queers, and a long list of other marginalized queer identities?
The visibility and momentum of the struggle for gay marriage equality are so huge that they often overshadow other struggles within the queer movement that are, in my opinion, far more interesting and progressive. Queerness (as an open category that includes all marginalized sexual and gender identities) has the potential to revolutionize love, because it affirms *any* way that love, sex, and gender are experienced. Queerness is radical in its acceptance and recognition of all forms of love, whereas “gay marriage” is an institution that only acknowledges queerness insofar as it mimics the same relationship model as straight people and the conservative mainstream.
In this light, gay marriage equality is actually heteronormative, in that it packages queerness into something that looks a lot like straightness. Let’s consider a radical alternative: do away altogether with the current power structure that dominates sexuality and gender expression (including marriage). Let people love each other and express themselves freely, without attaching privilege to any particular ways of doing these things. This kind of sexual/gender anarchy would rock society’s boat pretty hard, considering the deep entrenchment of heterosexual patriarchy in mainstream daily living. So in favor of preventing the turbulence entailed in this revolution, it is desirable for conservative America to opt for gay-marriage-equality over queer-love-anarchy. “Gayness” and “gay marriage” is simply the easiest pill for America to swallow; it is justice dished out the same way it’s been dished out to women, people of color, and all sorts of othered peoples throughout history.
This is not to say that I am anti-gay-marriage, because I believe that anyone who wants to get married should be able to get married. I just think that channeling a ton of queer energy into the fight for gay marriage equality is selling the queer movement short. What about putting more of our resources toward health care reform? Immigration reform to help loved ones stay together, regardless of sexuality? School counselors that are better trained to help young queer people get to know themselves more lovingly and honestly? There are so many steps that we could collectively take toward a world that embraces and affirms all of its lovers, and I think that the marriage struggle diverts attention and resources away from more important change.
—————————
From Queer Fairyland to a Wedding on Long Island…
My story begins in middle Tennessee, where I was living with faeries on an off-grid land project for several months beginning in March. A lot happened to me while I was there. I wore drag for the first time. I learned how to use a chainsaw. I befriended genderbenders, trans people, anarchist punks, queens, and witches. Yes, real witches. I had my first polyamorous relationship (read: new and exciting partner + overwhelming waves of jealousy, anxiety, fear, and insecurity). I met my first true friend with HIV. The variety and intensity of my experience with the faeries was all-consuming.
This is the scenario from which I was whipped away to be the best man for my brother’s wedding. I’d like to emphasize the dramatic nature of this shift – queer fairyland, open relationships, anarchy, growing food, meeting fun new glittery people in the woods, literally everyone is queer –> WHAM! –> suit, tie, writing a toast, wearing deodorant, straightness all around, people who have “real jobs,” having to explain to my extended family exactly where I am and what I am doing these days (“oh, you know, just farming in tutus and milking goats on a queer anarchist collective in rural Tennessee…”).
I was at first frustrated to be pulled away from this wild new experience into a conventional heterosexual love ritual. Additionally, I was (and am) working to undo a great deal of social conditioning derived from marriage as an institution; my expectations of monogamy, my desire to control and to be controlled, and my tendency toward co-dependence are all things I’ve inherited in part from marriage, and are all things that don’t serve me right now. I am exploring polyamory and open relationships and all things non-heteronormative. Why would I be interested in participating in a wedding? Despite these doubts, though, I love my brother plainly and simply. I decided to forego my queer politics in honor of respecting his love ritual, regardless of its form.
The wedding was more or less a traditional one. My brother told me that he used a website called theknot.com to organize a great deal of the event. This website basically sets a schedule and gives guidelines for planning each element – choice of location, invitations, flowers, food, photographer, music, etc. The ceremony and reception were on the water in Long Island, in close proximity to both families. I am not sure exactly how much the wedding cost in total, but it was definitely many thousands of dollars. There were several personal touches. During the rehearsal dinner, for example, my sisters performed an original song. The kiddush cup for the ceremony was a hand-blown glass that I made, and my father, who is a rabbi, officiated the ceremony.
My personal experience of the wedding was split in two. On the one hand, I was disinterested in the formalities and conventions. The idea of a website framing the whole process, all the money spent on it, the staff of strangers in starchy outfits serving tiny appetizers on toothpicks, and all the dressing up and manicuring for the sake of traditional photographs were unappealing to me (to my family’s credit, though, they did let me keep my off-beat haircut). Why was this production necessary or desirable in order to celebrate this couple’s love? On the other hand, I recognized that this event, regardless of its nature, was an important opportunity to reconnect with my family – an opportunity that is easy to overlook (and even resent) in the midst of a radical culture like the faeries. I tried to imagine how to be present for this event without betraying my political and sexual identity, and without putting on a mask of traditional heterosexual culture.
I came to terms with this dilemma during the process of writing my toast. I wrote mostly about my brother’s curiosity, knack for exploring, and capacity for sharing and teaching. I included a line about how these are qualities that I see in myself, and that they directly contribute to my expanding identity as a queer person – curiosity, exploration, and sharing/teaching are all skills that are important to foster as I walk my path of self-discovery. I felt good about this content because it honestly illuminated my brother as a person, while making a direct link to my own experience. I found a bridge between two worlds that had previously felt very distant: my queer identity and my family identity. It was nice to acknowledge, in his wedding, the ways that he has positively influenced my own love.
It was important for me to go through this experience because of both personal and political reasons. Personally, I’m not sure I would have chosen of my own accord to reach out to my family after living with the faeries. I was disinterested in reconnecting with my past in an attempt to sever myself from old ways of being, and establish my new, “real” identity. Yet my family is a community that has supported and loved me on my path to where I currently stand, and it would be delusional and self-hating to reject that past.
On a less personal level, I also believe that it is important for those with strong political views (such as my views on queerness) to engage with external communities. Radicals are prone to isolation because they care deeply about their struggles, and it takes a great deal of effort to communicate with people who are not on the same page. I had something important to share not only with my family, but the entire crowd at the wedding – which is on the whole not used to engaging with someone like me. Integration and the weaving-together of different worlds are tasks that I hope to take on throughout my life, and I am grateful to have learned this lesson early on.
——————————
Deepening Ceremony…
Here is a story that provides some contrast. While I was in Portland, I was staying with a friend who lives at Tryon Life Community Farm, a beautiful collective of about 15 people stewarding the land and growing food. During my stay, I had the pleasure of witnessing a wonderful event hosted by two lovers named Matt and Kelly who live there. They hosted a “deepening ceremony” for their extended network of family and friends in Portland – this ceremony was a way to celebrate their growing love for each other despite their decision not to get married.
There were many parts of the ceremony that inspired me. First, after gathering in a large circle at the beginning, everyone was asked to go explore the farm and bring back something to contribute to a love mandala on the ground. One by one, we laid down our symbolic offerings while offering a blessing to Matt and Kelly.

Note the bird wings toward the top of the mandala – Matt and Kelly added those themselves, explaining that they envision their relationship as though they were each one wing of the same bird. First of all, what a beautiful symbol?!? Secondly, before I even saw them lay down these bird wings, as I put down my contribution to the mandala, I shared a Hafiz quote about flying (Hafiz is a famous 13th century Sufi Poet):
This
sky
where we live
is no place to lose your wings.
So love, love,
love.
I was excited that I serendipitously chose a quote that complimented their bird metaphor.
Another moment that I really enjoyed: Matt and Kelly washed each others’ hands and faces in front of everyone present, to symbolize their washing away what that doesn’t serve them as they move forward and grow deeper in their relationship. I thought this was a beautiful way to anticipate and work with change in their future.
The rest of the event was very laid back. There was a huge potluck and several wonderful musicians playing music until late in the night. There was also a fire. I appreciate how this ceremony basically cost nothing, was inclusive and open to their entire Portland community, and was so simple! Good friends, good company, a fire, music, a love mandala…that is a pretty amazing love ritual if you ask me. Congratulations, Matt and Kelly, and thank you so much for sharing your deepening ceremony with me.
To see non-queer-identified people engaging in this kind of political struggle against marriage is unusual for me, and I am very excited by it. Matt and Kelly are other-ing themselves, relinquishing privilege (marriage) in honor of a lifestyle that truly reflects their values and ideals. This act is expansive because it integrates straight people into the queer movement’s vision of justice.
Let me expand that idea. Gayness, 30 years ago, opened up the possibility space for the larger idea of queerness to exist as it does now; likewise, I see queerness as preempting the next phase of the movement, which will be even more inclusive than the marginalized identities that currently compose it. The next thing will include straight people like Matt and Kelly, and anyone else that actively resists heteronormativity and patriarchy. Sometimes I joke that the next big thing will be “odd,” as in, “I’m not queer, I’m just a little odd.” Straight, gay, queer, trans, poly, and literally anyone should be invited to participate in the odd love revolution that queerness is starting right now. As an odd person, I am excited by the potential of my community, and I eagerly await major changes on the horizon.
In the meantime, though, I am not boycotting any weddings or feeling any anger toward those who choose to participate in them. Loving communication is critical to the odd movement, and as someone who believes in affirming the diversity of love, sexuality, and gender expression, I will continue to support loved ones who choose to get married. But I also long for a day when marriage is no longer the cornerstone of loving relationships, and when odd people of all sorts will be able to freely express their love in whatever form they choose without suffering a loss of rights or privilege.